Web application frameworks tend to be many things; however, they often fall into one category: robust. These frameworks are necessary for developing reliable and efficient web applications that can meet the dynamic needs of any business.
Developers of all sorts are finding ways to simplify the creation of web applications. These frameworks reduce confusion and, in turn, help you save time. Some frameworks even focus on building single-page applications.
The newest player on the market is catching a lot of attention from developers due to its simple design and high performance. That framework is called next js. Next.js and Nest.js are two such frameworks that have seen growth in their demand.
The frameworks are based on criteria such as their use cases, popularity, learning curve, and the support both get from the community.
This article will explore various parameters that'll help you select the best web application frameworks for your business.
Click to learn more about Next Js vs React.
Next.js comes with its own Node.js server that is preconfigured and makes setting up Next.js a lot easier for developers. They can use it to send simple indexable HTML output to their users without worrying about issues related to caching, programming architecture, or any of the other things required before Next.js came along, such as setting aside time for dealing with these issues.
The following are some of the main pros and cons of Next.js:
Nest.js is an open-source framework for building web applications. The framework uses TypeScript and is written in TypeScript, with a component-based architecture similar to Angular.
Nest.js is a framework that offers cross-platform functionality and flexibility and combines aspects of OOP (Object-Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming).
Sticking with the component-based structure of Angular, Nest.js is built around the idea of components and how they interact with one another. Nest.js takes this idea a step further by introducing a hierarchical component system that allows for components to be nested within other components. This creates a very natural and easy way to construct your application in a way that feels intuitive and familiar to developers from all backgrounds.
So, Node provides, in essence, the platform upon which Nest runs - all while simultaneously addressing my architectural deficiencies.
Nest.js’s advantages include, but are not limited to:
Next.js allows developers to write apps that can scale with minimal configuration and a very small footprint. The only configuration needed is to create an index.js file that does the initial configuration. This is great for developers looking to create a universal application.
On the other hand, Nest is built around modularity, so you only need to install the packages you need. Nest also has built-in support for more complex features like server-side rendering and intelligent routing. There's also built-in support for external data fetching, and Nest is built around a data-driven approach to universal applications.
The trends below show the outcomes for Next.js vs. Nest.js popularity over time.
Next.js has over 38K GitHub stars and 4K forks on GitHub, making it more popular than Nest.js. With 17K GitHub stars and 1K GitHub forks, Nest.js's popularity is far second to Next.js.
Companies And Developer Stacks
A total of 82 companies and 69 developer stacks have mentioned Next.js in the past. Alternatively, 12 companies and 13 developer stacks have been seen referencing Nest.js.
Next.js is a minimalistic framework that contains all the necessary features to create an application using React. On the other hand, Nest.js is not just a framework but an entire platform for building server-side applications using TypeScript and Node.js.
Next.js users have access to an extensive list of tutorials, blog posts, and videos created by the Next.js community. This can be very helpful if you find yourself stuck or needing a refresher on a topic.
Nest.js has created a community of developers with plenty of resources available to help out new programmers. Nest.js has a larger following than Next.js and is more likely to have more readily available developers if you need someone to jump in on your project.
It's important to choose the right framework for your needs, considering what you hope to achieve before getting started. If you're looking for something straightforward, then Nest might be worth trying out; but if you want something more advanced with plenty of features available, then Next.js could be an ideal solution.
While Nest is a general-purpose framework that works well with TypeScript and can be used to build many different kinds of server-side apps, Next.js has been specifically designed as a React-based solution aimed at providing everything necessary when building websites or web apps using this library/framework combination (such as routing).
Everyone has different tastes when it comes to choosing the right framework, but one thing is for sure - Next.js and Nest.js are both popular choices! Their Github reviews show that Next.js is more of choice for developers who frequently ship code in each iteration while Nest.js is generally easier to use and understand.